Who Needs An Apology?

THE Canadians are a strange lot. Who in their right mind would offer apologies with folded hands for something that happened more than a century ago? Justin Trudeau, Canada’s young prime minister, has decided to tender a formal apology next month before parliament for what is known as the Komagata Maru incident of 1914.
What happened in 1914? Komagata Maru was a Japanese ship that sailed from Hong Kong carrying 376 Indians – 340 of them Sikhs – to Canada. But when the ship finally arrived in Vancouver after a long and arduous journey, the Canadian government refused to let the passengers come ashore.
Komagata Maru was ordered to head back while the Indians in Canada fought pitched legal battles to delay the departure. The ship sat in the harbour for more than two months.
The desperate migrants even attacked the Canadian police showering them with lumps of coal and bricks. Eventually when the ill-fated ship returned to Calcutta with its miserable human cargo, it faced the wrath of the British colonial powers in India. At least 19 passengers were killed in clashes with the police while the rest were jailed.
Obviously, the Komagata Maru tragedy wasn’t the first of its kind involving the ‘boat people’ – the fellowship of migrants and hopeless dreamers who put their lives on the line to make it to that imagined paradise at the end of the rainbow, on the far side of the world. Yet it caused quite a stir internationally.
Although it hasn’t quite received the attention it deserves in India, it has long been part of the emotional lore of the strong Sikh community in Canada. This is why Stephen Harper, Trudeau’s predecessor, had apologised at an event in British Columbia in 2008. However, the Sikhs have sought an official apology before parliament. Which is what Trudeau has promised to do next month.
Given the current mood in the West against the migrants and at a time when Western politicians are calling for sinking ships of refugees and building high walls to keep out the ‘illegals’, Trudeau’s promised apology for what is not even seen by many as a crime shines like a ray of hope in the deepening doom and gloom all around us.
What was Trudeau thinking, apologising for something that he or his family hadn’t even been remotely connected with, when crimes far more serious in nature have been shrugged off?
The British are yet to acknowledge their shenanigans during their long colonial rule. We haven’t heard a word of apology for the coldblooded Jallianwala Bagh massacre in 1919. Or for the wholesale slaughter in Delhi and elsewhere that followed the 1857 war of independence.
The last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar’s, sons were butchered and their heads were presented on a platter before the aging, powerless potentate who was subsequently banished to Burma. The man-made Bengal famine killed more than 3 million people. And yet all that we Indians pine for today is that lifeless stone called Kohinoor.
The Japanese have forever been bowing in remorse for the excesses committed during their occupation of the Korean peninsula, China, the Philippines, Hong Kong and Singapore etc. However, one hasn’t heard a word of remorse for the annihilation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki or, for that matter, for the all-consuming Western wars in Vietnam, Cambodia and elsewhere in Asia that claimed millions of innocent lives, besides totally ravaging these countries. The Americans are yet to acknowledge the elimination of the indigenous population and their whole civilisation. A similar fate befell the original inhabitants of South America and Australia.
And who will apologise for centuries of rape, slaughter and pillage of Africa? Millions and millions of Africans were abducted and sold as slaves in Europe and America. Who will apologise to the Algerians, Libyans and other Arabs for colonial crimes?
German and European politicians have repeatedly expressed remorse for the Jewish Holocaust and other Nazi crimes. But who will apologise to the Palestinians for gifting away their country and their very identity to strangers born thousands of miles away?
Who will wipe the tears of Afghans, Iraqis, Syrians, Libyans, Pakistanis and many, many others whose countries have been destroyed in the name of the war on terror?
The irrepressible Tony Blair is prepared to apologise for the Irish potato famine of the 19th century but cannot bring himself to say ‘sorry’ for the million lives he and his neo-con friends squandered in Iraq.
Back home in India, no one has ever apologised to the tens of thousands of innocents killed in religious riots and pogroms. No one has paid for sparking a riot or inciting hatred and violence against vulnerable groups. The few who were convicted in Gujarat are all out now.
No one has ever acknowledged, let alone apologised, for wrecking thousands of innocent lives and careers in the name of fighting terror.
Mohammed Aamir was 18 when he was picked up in 1998 in Delhi; he was put away for 14 years, implicated in 19 terror cases. He’s out now having honourably been acquitted. No apology will bring back his lost years though. And there are hundreds of Aamirs out there, as Harsh Mander suggests.
Talking of apologies, how about offering one to Kashmiris. They have buried thousands of their loved ones over the past few decades for the sin of being born in the Himalayan paradise.
As prime minister, Manmohan Singh was gracious enough to apologize for the 1984 pogrom. However, it’s not Singh but the Congress and the family at its helm that owe the Sikhs and the nation an apology for 1984. An entire community was hunted like animals in India’s capital with the connivance and complicity of those in power.
Another example of the state’s complicity in the organised slaughter of a minority is that of Gujarat 2002. Those responsible have not only evaded accountability all these years, they do not even betray a sense of remorse, let alone apologise.
The whole world watched the 2002 horror unfold on their television screens for months. Fourteen years on, it seems as if we are still stuck in that time warp. And truly enough, without genuine remorse, not a heartless, convoluted analogy of puppets coming under cars, the ghosts of Gujarat cannot be put to rest.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu said: “In almost every language, the most difficult words are ‘I am sorry’.” The Nobel Laureate should know. He forgave the worst tormentors of his people, as did the fellow South African, the great Nelson Mandela.      
The Prophet (pbuh) offered general amnesty to his sworn enemies after the fall of Makkah. Jesus advised: If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek.
That was the way of the prophets. Lesser mortals perhaps cannot be so magnanimous. When hurt, it’s only human to expect penitence. Without acknowledgement of guilt, there’s no reconciliation. There’s no moving forward. And mind you, as Tutu warns, spurious reconciliation only leads to spurious healing.
Of course, no apology can put back the clock nor can it bring back the dead. The dead do not need an apology. But an apology can go a long way in administering a healing touch. These long-festering wounds may not miraculously vanish overnight but they could hurt less. And remember this may be the only opportunity for atonement.

Follow this link to join our WhatsApp group: Join Now

MONTHLY	Rs 100
YEARLY	Rs 1000
LIFETIME	Rs 10000

CLICK FOR DETAILS